Alder, K. 2002. The measure of all things: The seven-year odyssey and hidden error that transformed the world. New York: The Free Press.
Andriessen, D. 2003. Making sense of intellectual capital: Designing a method for the valuation of intangibles. Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Andrich, D. 1988. Rasch models for measurement. (Vols. series no. 07-068). Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.
Biagioli, M. 1996. Etiquette, interdependence, and sociability in seventeenth-century science. Critical Inquiry, 22(2), 193-218.
Bond, T., & Fox, C. 2001. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates [http://homes.jcu.edu.au/~edtgb/book/; 2nd edition published 2007].
Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. 1990. What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404-431.
Coase, R. 1990. The firm, the market, and the law. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Crosby, A. W. 1997. The measure of reality: Quantification and Western society, 1250-1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daston, L. 1992. Baconian facts, academic civility, and the prehistory of objectivity. Annals of Scholarship, 8, 337-363. (Rpt. in L. Daston, (Ed.). 1994. Rethinking objectivity (pp. 37-64). Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
Dawson, T. L. 2002, March. New tools, new insights: Kohlberg's moral reasoning stages revisited. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(2), 154-66.
De Soto, H. 2000. The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. New York: Basic Books.
Diewert, W. E. 1980. Aggregation problems in the measurement of capital. In D. Usher (Ed.), The measurement of capital (pp. 433-528). National Bureau of Economic Research Studies in Income and Wealth, 45. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Ekins, P., Hillman, M., & Hutchison, R. 1992. The Gaia atlas of green economics. Foreword by Robert Heilbroner. New York: Anchor Books.
Embretson, S. E. 1998, September. A cognitive design system approach to generating valid tests: Application to abstract reasoning. Psychological Methods, 3(3), 380-396.
Fisher, W. P., Jr. 1997. Physical disability construct convergence across instruments: Towards a universal metric. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 1(2), 87-113.
Fisher, W. P., Jr. 2000. Objectivity in psychosocial measurement: What, why, how. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 4(2), 527-563.
Fisher, W. P., Jr. 2004, October. Meaning and method in the social sciences. Human Studies: A Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences, 27(4), 429-54.
Fisher, W. P., Jr., & Wright, B. D. (Eds.). 1994. Applications of probabilistic conjoint measurement. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(6), 557-664.
Frisch, R. 1936. Annual survey of general economic theory: The problem of index numbers. Econometrica, 4, 1-39.
Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Green, K. E., & Kluever, R. C. 1992. Components of item difficulty of Raven's Matrices. Journal of General Psychology, 119, 189-199.
Hawken, P., Lovins, A., & Lovins, H. L. 1999. Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution. New York: Little, Brown, and Co.
Hunter, J. S. 1980, November. The national system of scientific measurement. Science, 210(21), 869-874.
Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Jasanoff, S. 2004. States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. (International Library of Sociology). New York: Routledge.
Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Latour, B. 1995. Cogito ergo sumus! Or psychology swept inside out by the fresh air of the upper deck: Review of Hutchins' Cognition in the Wild, MIT Press, 1995. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 3(1), 54-63.
Latour, B. 1999. Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. (Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. 1979. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
National Institute for Standards and Technology. 1996. Appendix C: Assessment examples. Economic impacts of research in metrology. In C. o. F. S. Subcommittee on Research (Ed.), Assessing fundamental science: A report from the Subcommittee on Research, Committee on Fundamental Science. Washington, DC: National Standards and Technology Council [http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/ostp/assess/nstcafsk.htm#Topic%207; last accessed 30 May 2007].
O'Connell, J. 1993. Metrology: The creation of universality by the circulation of particulars. Social Studies of Science, 23, 129-173.
Putnam, R. D. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D., & Goss, K. A. 2002. Introduction. In R. D. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society (pp. 3-19). New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
Rasch, G. 1960. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Reprint, with Foreword and Afterword by B. D. Wright, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980). Copenhagen, Denmark: Danmarks Paedogogiske Institut.
Rasch, G. 1961. On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. In Proceedings of the fourth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability (pp. 321-333). Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
Rasch, G. 1977. On specific objectivity: An attempt at formalizing the request for generality and validity of scientific statements. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy, 14, 58-94.
Schaffer, S. 1992. Late Victorian metrology and its instrumentation: A manufactory of Ohms. In R. Bud & S. E. Cozzens (Eds.), Invisible connections: Instruments, institutions, and science (pp. 23-56). Bellingham, WA: SPIE Optical Engineering Press.
Shapin, S. 1994. A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, E. V., Jr., & Smith, R. M. 2004. Introduction to Rasch measurement. Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
Stenner, A. J., Burdick, H., Sanford, E. E., & Burdick, D. S. 2006. How accurate are Lexile text measures? Journal of Applied Measurement, 7(3), 307-22.
Surowiecki, J. 2004. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. New York: Doubleday.
van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.). 1997. Handbook of modern Item Response Theory (IRT). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Wernimont, G. 1978, December. Careful intralaboratory study must come first. ASTM Standardization News, 6, 11-12.
Wise, M. N. 1995. Precision: Agent of unity and product of agreement. Part III--"Today Precision Must Be Commonplace." In M. N. Wise (Ed.), The values of precision (pp. 352-61). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Wright, B. D. 1977. Solving measurement problems with the Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14(2), 97-116.
Wright, B. D. 1980. Foreword, Afterword. In Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests, by Georg Rasch (pp. ix-xix, 185-199. http://www.rasch.org/memo63.htm) [Reprint; original work published in 1960 by the Danish Institute for Educational Research]. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
Wright, B. D. 1999. Fundamental measurement for psychology. In S. E. Embretson & S. L. Hershberger (Eds.), The new rules of measurement: What every educator and psychologist should know (pp. 65-104 [http://www.rasch.org/memo64.htm]). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. 1979. Best test design: Rasch measurement. Chicago, Illinois: MESA Press.
Copyright 1995-2014 Living Capital Metrics Last updated May 9, 2014.