Living Capital Metrics

Sustainability Metrics

Emerging Eco-Economies

Technical Background

How many capitals?

Get Involved

Get Started

Tutoring and Consulting

For more information

Free sample data analysis

About William

William's blog

Research papers

Photo gallery

Measurement and Capital

Capital theory

What is living capital?

Contrasting dead and living capital metrics

Equilibrium or nonequilibrium models?

Media and messages

How to bring capital to life

The philosophy of living meaning

The wisdom of crowds

A mathematical definition of capital

Reference list

What can be done to bring dead capital to life? There's a list of survey design recommendations (that apply generally to tests and assessments as well) on the last three pages of the issue of Rasch Measurement Transactions posted at  http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt203.pdf .


As to the nuts and bolts, specialized software for data analysis is available from a number of sources. Ministeps is available for free at http://www.winsteps.com/ministep.htm but works only for very small data sets (25 items and 75 cases). For larger data sets, you'll need Winsteps ( http://www.winsteps.com/winsteps.htm ), RUMM ( http://www.rummlab.com.au/ ), ConQuest (available at www.assess.com), or one of the several other available programs (for a list with web sites, see http://www.rasch.org/software.htm ). If you're calibrating judges assessing employees' performances you'll need either ConQuest or Facets (http://www.winsteps.com/facets.htm). In a multifaceted measurement situation (people rated by judges relative to criteria using a rating scale), you'll need to pay close attention to your assessment design to make sure all the judges are linked (see the Facets manual for more info).

Winsteps includes worked examples from the best-selling introductory book on practical approaches to realizing meaningful measurement and fairly calibrated instrumentation (Bond & Fox, 2007).


Information on training workshops is available on the respective web sites, and at www.rasch.org/confer.htm.. I am available to answer questions and for larger consulting projects, by request.


Obtaining really meaningful, fair, and objective measurement takes considerable expertise. Local instrument calilbrations are not a huge problem, but, just as no single individual, firm, or industry could have created the existing metric system alone, we must all act together to create a system of universally uniform metrics for human, social, and natural capital.


I present my case for such a system in a White Paper I submitted to NIST in July, 2009 (http://www.livingcapitalmetrics.com/images/FisherNISTWhitePaper2.pdf ). A blog proposing draft legislation supporting development and adoption of a metric system for intangible assets is at http://livingcapitalmetrics.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/draft-legislation/ .


Given the essential role precision measurement plays in reducing transaction costs and reducing market frictions, and that NIST documents returns on investment of 40% to over 400% for various improvements to the existing metric system, I'm betting that health care reform, improved educational outcomes, and effective ways of addressing environmental issues all hinge on creating a common language of meaningful measures we all think in together.


I've been writing to various Senate committees, etc., but my lone single voice is drowned out in the general cacophony.

I am open to suggestions on how to proceed from here.


In principle, three areas of activity need to be addressed simultaneously.

First, the existing metrology infrastructure must be expanded to include measures of human, social, and natural capital. This infrastructure must require:

  • that all instruments measuring the same thing do so in the same universal uniform metric that is additive, divisible, and mobile,
  • open architectures that allow and encourage metrological quality improvements,
  • that the needs of as many stakeholders as possible be met in the common language of a single standard,
  • the same kinds of checks on the stability of the metrics as are in use in the Systeme Internationale, and
  • that the measures can be aggregated for use in managing each significant economic level and sector.
The second major area of activity’s primary focus should be on identifying what forms of human, social, and natural capital need to be measured and managed. An incomplete list of possible forms of capital to be measured includes:
  • Human
    • Health and functionality
    • Literacy and numeracy
    • Motivations and attitudes
    • Abilities and skills
  • Social
    • Democratic freedoms
    • Mutual trust, good will, loyalty
    • Quality of life
  • Natural
    • Air and water purification
    • Fisheries
    • Gene pool diversity
    • Topsoil quality
    • Watershed erosion protection
Third, this far-from-comprehensive list will be then complemented by questions as to what experiments have already tested the key forms of capital for additivity, divisibility, and mobility.

Reference cited
Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences, 2d edition. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

The third major area of activity will be the design of tests, surveys, and assessments to measure what needs to be managed. It will be vital that instruments be designed so that data will meet the mathematically rigorous requirements of additivity, divisibility, and mobility in publicly accessible and reproducible ways. One set of approaches to this work (described in more detail elsewhere (Fisher, 2005)) that has proven to be of marked utility comes under the heading of Rasch models (Rasch, 1960, 1961, 1977; Andrich, 1988; Wright, 1977, 1999; Bond & Fox, 2007; http://www.rasch.org). These models are implemented via fairly widely accessible software, are employed in a wide variety of published research studies, and are made internationally available by consultants, conferences, and training seminars.
Copyright 1995-2023
Living Capital Metrics
Last updated 10 January 2023.
Creative Commons License
LivingCapitalMetrics.com by William P. Fisher, Jr., Ph.D. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Based on a work at www.livingcapitalmetrics.com.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://www.livingcapitalmetrics.com.

     
          View William P Fisher Jr's profile on LinkedIn
       
   

Measures for Managing Living Capital